It was with a great deal of amusement that I read this piece on CNN about how people’s astrological signs have not changed. Not blog-worthy, mind you, but amusing.

Until I reached the end, and read this:

Astrology is geocentric. It relates life on Earth to the Earth’s environment, and seasons are the most dramatic effect.
- Jeff Jawer, astrologist at tarot.com

And I thought to myself: wait, wait, wait … is this astrologist claiming that astrology has nothing to do with the heavens?

Stepping back

First, let us see what the whole hubbub is about.

Astrology is the belief that the relative positions of objects in the heavens (the sun, moon and stars) influence people’s personalities and events on earth. While the website that Jawer works for does not define it quite so clearly (what’s that? Astrologists being vague?), their definition – “astrology is the ancient system that correlates life on Earth with the ever-changing patterns of the sky” – seems to correspond with mine.

In particular, zodiac signs correspond with constellations. It purportedly means something when your constellation (ie, group of stars that people thought looked liked something familiar to them thousands of years ago) was “in line” with the sun.

So last week there was a little hubbub when the Minneapolis Star-Tribune wrote an article titled the stars might not actually be aligned in your favour. In it, they observed that the timing of the constellations changes over time, and (as astrologers use timings derived over 2,000 years ago) the standard dates used by astrologers to delineate the zodiac are about a month out.

Stepping forward

In response to this, our astrologist quoted above is saying that he knows this, and it doesn’t matter because astrology revolves around seasons, not constellations.

What?

Here at the Big Bad Blog, it has always seemed quite evident to us that Astrology is a load of bunk, but it’s nice to see somebody who makes a living on it admits the same thing.

Because by claiming that earth’s changing relation to the heavens does not impact astrology, Jawer is saying that the relative positioning of objects in the heaven do not influence personalities and events on earth.

And that’s something we can agree with.

Worried about snakes on a plane? You shouldn’t be. These motherfucking snakes don’t need no motherfucking plane.

(by Helmut Smits)

Raped cheerleaders in New Orleans, beware! According to legal precedent, you will be required to cheer for the man who raped you.

Looking for a new place to discover new music? Try a Swede!

Back in April, the website ThinkGeek created an April Fool’s Day joke — the sale of canned unicorn meat. You have probably seen this if you have the internet. And you probably have the internet.

Now ThinkGeek has been served with a Cease and Desist Order from the National Pork Board, asking them to stop selling unicorn meat using their registered trademark THE OTHER WHITE MEAT.

(by Alejandra Bartoliche)

In the world of bizarre internet turf wars, after astronomer Stuart Robbins showed that astrologer Terry Nazon’s claims about Mayans were inaccurate (with the help of an archaeologist), Ms. Nazon started to impersonate Mr. Robbins on various websites. While posting under the guise of Mr. Robbins, Ms. Nazon posted complaints about others being “anonymous cowards” and “phonies”.

Mashable is reporting some interesting stats regarding the use of Facebook statuses to deal with partners. While the stats are almost certainly incredibly inaccurate (they come from an online survey which exists on a Facebook page for those trying to hook up with strangers through Facebook), it does raise an interesting question: How often (and for what reasons) do people create fraudulent (in which we mean untrue, rather than illegal) updates via social media?