Not all web tools are created equal. Some — such as LiveJournal, WordPress or ToodleDo caught me from the moment I signed up for the service. Others are used haltingly, at least at first, and slowly worm their way into regular use.

Twitter falls into the latter category.

When we first joined Twitter, we barely used it. It was not until we found Tweetie for iPhone and the Tweetdeck desktop client that we became heavy Twitter users. It seems that it was not the service that was the problem, so much as the interface.

Eventually, Twitter purchased Tweetie, and it became Twitter for iPhone.

At first we shrugged – why care?

Then we applauded. Good on Twitter to recognize their user-interface weakness and go out and acquire a company that designed a pretty good one.

Then we shrieked in horror, as the whole thing backfired. Rather than the Tweetie expertise in creating a good user experience for the tweeters out there leading to an improvement to the Twitter interface on other platforms, Twitter instead decided to redesign Tweetie into something I no longer wanted to use.

Today, I use Tweetdeck everywhere — on my phone, on my computer. I rarely remember my dreams, but I’m probably using it there, too.

And now Twitter looks poised to purchase Tweetdeck. To this we say to Twitter: keep your hands off my stuff!

Seriously, Twitter people. You have a great service, but are terrible at designing interfaces for that service. If you do buy Tweetdeck, we will not wait to see what you do with it, but begin searching immediately for a replacement — your interface issues are now part and parcel of what it means to be Twitter. Things would be better if you would accept that and play to your strengths.

Meanwhile, elsewhere on the Internet, Facebook is rumored to be looking at the purchase of Skype.

If there ever were two services that we use reluctantly, they would be Facebook and Skype.

Facebook is the network that nobody seemingly uses willingly — we all interact on Facebook not because we love it, but because everybody else is there. Every few months, the people at Facebook make design changes that annoy its users. And at least twice a year, they introduce a change which undermines the privacy of their users.

Skype is another service that people use because it is there. Much as Facebook is the default social network, Skype is the default choice for VoIP. Which means that if you want to video-chat with your mother over the Internet, there are no other choices. Call quality is surprisingly (but consistently) poor.

Lately, Skype has been experiencing security issues, with their Mac and Android versions putting users at risk.

At least if Facebook took over, we could be reasonably certain that the leaking of confidential user data to third parties was intentional.

(Of course, after writing this, it is revealed that Microsoft has bought Skype. So we can presumably expect Skype to become yet another quality Microsoft product, free of bugs and never-ending security updates.)

Perhaps we are entering an age of electronic consolidation — the point in an industry where firms merge in order to leverage their talents across every aspect of the industry.

In which case — with the biggest players all having significant flaws — we may all be doomed.

Twitter is a very strange beast.

Here at the Big Bad Blog, we were a bit late to Twitter, for the simple reason that the official interface is horrific, and the original (pre-smartphone) concept which ties it to text messaging on mobile phones seemed archaic.

But Twitter has transformed itself into pretty much the best bit of social media around. It is mobile and public by design, and simply feels right to use, in a way that other platforms do not (at least to this blogger). They have also stolen wisely: retweets and replies originate with third party developers.

So when Luke Dicken suggests that Twitter has jumped the shark, my initial reaction is to scoff. His point is that its new strategy of discouraging third-party applications will mark the beginning of the end for Twitter.

After a bit of thought, however, the only beef this blog has with any of Dicken’s arguments is the suggestion that the practice is new. Witness Twitter’s purchase of Tweetie, once my iPhone Twitter client. Twitter is trying to own the interface, not just the service, and the latest announcement is just the latest bit of strategy along those lines.

Dicken makes many important and valid points regarding the diversity of those using the Twitter service, pointing out that a single interface is not a recipe for success. He also points out that these same third-party developers are the ones who were responsible for creating many of the better features of the service.

Dicken does, however, miss the most important observation: Twitter is horrible at creating user interfaces.

Their website is awful. Many people do not use their website, but prefer a Desktop (or mobile) application — compare to the legions who log in to Facebook’s actual website, or gMail.

Their iPhone application is not one developed internally, but is the result of having bought out an already-popular application. And Twitter’s own changes to that application have ruined it — here at the Big Bad Blog, we are now actively auditioning replacements. Others apparently hate it as well, though perhaps we are alone in our continued vehement disappointment in the new product following a quick update in which Twitter fixed the reading portion of the application (but not the writing portion).

It is this persistent belief at Twitter, that they are capable of designing an interface that users will enjoy, that will be the downfall of the service.

They have yet to show that they can do so; their confidence is misplaced.

All of which leaves the Big Bad Blog wondering: what is the micro-blogging service that will replace them?

We might as well start using it now.

The Fail Whale cake is by Mariana Pugliese of Buenos Aires. The photo is from the 99c Blog.